God Loves Me, Too

[John V]

Why do you get a pass on the logic and burden of proof, while I do not?

Regarding burden of proof, it typically falls on the person making the initial claim. You hang out on an atheist board – you know that. If someone claims that the Bible puts many weird restrictions on sex, it’s up to them to support it. If someone claims that a woman is unlikely to develop a fulfilling sex life with only one partner, it’s up to them to support it.

Unfortunately there isn’t much research in this area. That brings us to logical arguments. We’re on equal footing with those. The readers judge whether they make sense. Maybe they agree with you, and think a woman is unlikely to discover that touching her clit feels good until she’s had multiple sex partners. To me that is quite illogical. Neither of us can prove our case because, as noted, research is lacking and anecdotal accounts don’t count for much.

As far as I'm concerned, you're referencing shit someone pulled out of their ass 2000 years ago, why can't I pull shit out of my ass to disagree with the shit you're claiming as "truth" and "Devine mandate"?

WTF are you talking about? I haven’t referenced the Bible at all in this line of the discussion.

P.S. The video is a rather benign, 30 second clip from a TLC promo. No literal face eating involved, though there is some seriously gag worthy tonsil hockey. But I assure you, the woman, who managed to make it to her wedding day in her late-20's to mid-30's without kissing someone, in all likelihood has never gotten jiggy with herself.

Your biased assurance of an anecdotal situation is completely worthless as evidence. You know that.

---

It makes perfect sense that you're lucky.

It's not luck, it's commitment, communication, and experimentation. If you practice those you'll figure it out. Sex boils down to touch. It's not really that difficult.