If Not Hell then what?

[Drich]

your reasoning and understanding of God was proven to be in error

Just because our understanding doesn't agree with yours doesn't mean it is in error.

The way "our" reason was in error in this case was because popeye defaulted to Logical Fallacies to push the conversation past, a critical comperhension failure of the God of the bible he could not reconcile resulting in 'an appeal to common sense/Divine fallacy.'

Like it or not the use of logical fallacies is a failure in the ablity to logically reason.

Speaking of the God of the bible in a way that differs from how the bible describes Him is a failure the basic understanding of God.

My assessment stands.

---

Drich, nothing you've said can be even remotely construed as a logical argument. My inability to imagine something has no bearing on whether or not its false.

Your inability to produce logical reasons for your claims paired with a complete lack of any logical reason for any similar claims is the reason I reject it as true. I've never said its false.

I've only made attempts to address your arguments (should they be presented AS ARGUMENTS) to explain why I, personally reject them. They are not governed by logic, they are irrational and unfounded opinions of the most extreme sense. Make a claim, justify it logically or stop filibustering like a blabbering idiot.

Red herring