(May 9, 2013 at 1:57 pm)xdrgnh Wrote:(May 9, 2013 at 1:55 pm)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote: Because logic and 'reason(?)' aren't evidence?
Okay then. I know I'd hate to be the one to defend that.
Those not scientific evidence which is the kind of evidence I believe most people here are asking for. I gave logical evidence in my OP for a Deist G-d which no one has refuted yet. Scientific evidence is experimental results.
Logic and 'reason(?)' don't constitute scientific evidence? Interesting... I wonder then: what does? Certainly not anything based solidly upon these.
I saw a bunch of nonsense, myself. Maybe I'll refute it later... perhaps when I don't have to leave possibly immediately
But then, what's the point of illustrating stupidity as a small child colors a book with a dog intestines?It wouldn't do to forget 'observation and' from that last statement... someone might get the wrong idea. Something about intersubjectivity, maybe it'll come to you.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day




