The Case for Theism

[Love]

Would you care to put forth an argument to illustrate that this is an incorrect assessment?

I have already done that. I pointed out that his argument is a logical fallacy and is, thus, ultimately invalid. An existential argument for the existence of God, for example in the form of a rational discussion, bares no relevance to moral philosophy, but rather epistemology — or more specifically existential/epistemological apologetics. Making a case for murder would ultimately be encapsulated within the conceptual framework of moral philosophy; murder is a moral issue, not epistemological.