Pope Francis defends atheists

[Drich]

Actually it is Minnie. Whether you like it or not whether you accept it or not it is indeed evidence. It may not be what you want to see or hear but there it is..

Horseshit. The fact that morons stubbornly cling to fairy tales does not make them true. There is probably some shithead somewhere who thinks Jack and the Beanstalk is true.

It isn't.

We need actual evidence. Artifacts. There are holes big enough to drive convoys of trucks through some of your favorite bible tales. You close your eyes and pull a cowardly lion routine.





It does you no credit. I think you are an asshole and there's no "jesus" to give you points for it.

Again Minnie it is actual evidence. It's just not accepted evidence. Just like if you were to be convicted of being an old cogger, and you presented evidence to the contrary. What you presented can not be reclassified or dismissed as not being evidence, as the mere fact that you presented it in your arguments against the charges of being an old cogger that have been levied against you. It's just if you were found guilty, the evidence you provided was not compelling enough or was outright not accepted to support your particular case. Again both sides present evidence, the fact that one side wins does not mean what the other side presented ceases to be classified as evidence.

As far as my argument here is concerned you have been provided evidence. End of story. Whether it tickles your fancy or not is of little concern to me, as my task here is to present all that I have been given. Which I have. All that is left now is judgement.

---

The bible is conspicuously silent about there being men on earth for hundreds of millennia before Adam. Which would be kind of odd considering that Adam was said to be created within a week of the universe.

The only thing the bible describes IS Creation from the POV of the Garden. Meaning All of what Genesis describes is what or how the world/universe unfolded from the epicenter of the Garden. So if one were given a singular perspective from with in the middle of all of the major activity that happened in the Garden then why should you think that anything outside of the garden would be mentioned, unless it could be seen from the vantage point of said garden?

Homosapien was not mention because He was not apart of the creation that happened within the borders of eden.

For that matter, I'm pretty sure nobody has ever found a trace of the garden of Eden.

Uh, we are fighting wars over the remnants of the Garden and have been for the last 100 years.
We know that from the description of the Garden or rather of the 4 rivers that flowed from it and defined it that Eden was in the middle of the Persian gulf.
"A river flowed out of Eden to water the garden, and there it divided and became four rivers. The name of the first is the Pishon. It is the one that flowed around the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold. And the gold of that land is good; bdellium and onyx stone are there. The name of the second river is the Gihon. It is the one that flowed around the whole land of Cush. And the name of the third river is the Tigris, which flows east of Assyria. And the fourth river is the Euphrates."

—Genesis 2:10-14

I studied with a man who could go one for weeks about Eden, but the long and short of it is that what is left of Eden lies under the sands of the middle east in the form of the largest accessiable oil deposit on the planet. (after all wouldn't there be like a 100 million bazillion years worth on "pre-oil" material saturating the ground thus seeding the oil fields of the Persian gulf?)

Shouldn't a sentry angel with a flaming sword be hard to miss?

It's a metaphore, for the Heat sun and sand God parked on top of what was once Eden. Or if your a literalist. The angel and his sword took the form of the worlds largest and hottest desert and parked themselves on top of what was once eden. Thus not allowing man to set foot in it again.

(To directly answer your question, It's not if you allow God to open your eyes so you can see.)