How do you know God isn't dead?

[Statler Waldorf]

Are you saying that just assumptions should be verifiable? If so, how might one confirm an assumption?

Now this is ironic, the self-proclaimed verificationist is now defending the merits of a dating method that is founded upon unverifiable assumptions. Whether an assumption is verifiable or not is largely dependent upon what sort of assumption we are dealing with. Basing your entire view of the history of the Earth on methods that are founded upon unverifiable assumptions and assumptions that appear to be downright false is not rational.

---

Another long post in which you have completely failed to understand the concept of a selectively neutral mutation - having a conversation in your head with some less informed person you are capable of arguing with- and added "nu-uhs" when confronted with observations that leave you no room to wiggle.

There are not enough trials in order to fix neutral mutations in a population through genetic drift, argue for the impossible all you want but it doesn’t make it anymore possible. Trust me Rhythm, my mental concept of your knowledge definitely errors on the side of you knowing more than you do in reality; I am a rather gracious person when it comes to that sort of thing.

Pointless Stat. I probably would have responded in kind except that there's nothing in your recent post that hasn't already been answered in the previous posts.

This excuse carries the foul stench of all being rather too convenient for you.