RE: Salvation Army: Gay parents deserve to be put to death
June 7, 2013 at 7:20 am
(This post was last modified: June 7, 2013 at 7:25 am by fr0d0.)
*fr0d0 slaps poet with a clue bat *
Really? How?
I'm not saying it's not there; and I'd kind of expect a middle of the road stance, although I know that isn't fashionable/not currently seen as ethical - stance. Just interested to get you point. Thanks.
(June 7, 2013 at 7:19 am)Ben Davis Wrote: the SA's response is a direct statement that there is a context in which it's ok to discriminate against a person based on their sexuality. That's a reprehensible statement and is a direct contradiction of their claim "The Salvation Army encompasses a diverse community with a wide range of opinions on human sexuality and other subjects".
Really? How?
I'm not saying it's not there; and I'd kind of expect a middle of the road stance, although I know that isn't fashionable/not currently seen as ethical - stance. Just interested to get you point. Thanks.
