(December 19, 2009 at 8:26 pm)Minimalist Wrote: So, IOW, you have "belief" and not "evidence."
Don't feel bad. None of the rest of you have any evidence, either.
No repeatable laboratory evidence no. If that is what you require?
Somethings are too important to be limited to that extent and must be understood with all our experiences not much repeatable ones.
Explain to me how someone a few thousand years ago was ment to know God before science? I believe the answer is that God is a person and so is known personally not by data.
Mark Taylor: "Religious conflict will be less a matter of struggles between belief and unbelief than of clashes between believers who make room for doubt and those who do not."
Einstein: “The most unintelligible thing about nature is that it is intelligible”
Einstein: “The most unintelligible thing about nature is that it is intelligible”
