RE: Ok.....So you killed off Religion...
June 12, 2013 at 8:19 am
(This post was last modified: June 12, 2013 at 8:46 am by DeistPaladin.)
(June 12, 2013 at 12:18 am)ronedee Wrote: Thanks....I didn't need any help! But here is a useful link:
And that's your complete rebuttal, is it? You really thought that was such a slam-dunk that you can just say "Q.E.D."?
Here's the full quote, to show Christians how this is done:
Quote:"debunked"? You think pretty highly of yourself. Well, you failed in this attempt (see below) ....and miserably I might add.
Summary: Denial without any substance
Logical Fallacy: Bare Assertion Just because you say so, doesn't make it so.
Quote:I especially liked the phonically challenged:
"How'd I do? Better than "duh, cus big invisible sky daddy sez not to."?
Logical Fallacy: Appeal to Ridicule. "Ha ha, you sound funny" isn't an argument.
EDIT TO ADD: What's more, you had already been told that appeal to ridicule is not an argument. And yet you ignored that response and represent that same post as if it were a slam-dunk? Are you a liar or are you just stupid?
And you Christians wonder why you're not taken seriously?
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist