(June 12, 2013 at 9:36 am)John V Wrote: Then don't. No one's asking you to. What's this "duty" you have? Why aren't you exercising it daily?
Because of the damage Christianity does to society. I'm making the world a better place by challenging it and doing my part to bury Jesus alongside Zeus, Odin and Ra.
Quote:In your mind.
Oh no, in reality. If you disagree, you can respond to my debunking of the morality argument. It's just one single post. I can repost the whole thing if it will help.
Quote:"I've ignored your link cause I didn't feel like reading 11 pages of old stuff..."
How about just reading the one post I linked to?
Quote:I agree in a formal debate.
Then we agree that this Christian lost. The formal debate is the one I'm referring to.
Quote:False comparison. Linking to a post =/= linking to a long thread.
But my post on morality is the one I linked to.
The link to the historicity of the Gospels debate is, admittedly, longer than my post on morality but it's a much broader topic. And even this debate exchange that I, by your admission, won, is nowhere near as long as "the entire AIG website".
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist