(July 1, 2013 at 6:30 am)Zen Badger Wrote:(June 29, 2013 at 2:07 pm)Godschild Wrote: The scriptures, just because you dislike them does not mean they do not tell us the facts of Christ. How many people did the Romans crucify, is there any historical records of each of them.
I'm intrigued GC, how do you deal with the complete lack of historical evidence for your god boy?
Do you just stick your fingers in your ears and go "la la la" until the naughty thoughts go away?
Or do you smash yourself repeatedly in the face with a bible until unconscious?
Either way it is blindingly obvious that you refuse to register that the scripture are historically worthless and of no import here.
BTW, the scriptures are the claim, not the evidence.
You wouldn't believe it if many historians had written about Christ, you would have called them... so and so and said they wrote 2000 yrs. ago what do they know. If you believe then you would have to give up yourself and you seem to be unwilling to do so for Christ.
If the historians had given us proof of Christ then the scriptures would be wrong, faith is the way to salvation, then the road to knowledge of who God is.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.