RE: One question for Christians
July 11, 2013 at 4:29 pm
(This post was last modified: July 11, 2013 at 4:32 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
Wow, GC and Ronedee deserve some sort of medal for putting up with all of you because the excrement you guys are tossing out there is even deeper than usual.
1. Genesis never says the Moon is a light source, so stop adding that language to the verse.
2. Genesis calls the Moon a light, which is completely valid, a light is simply anything that illuminates, and without the Moon there’d be virtually no natural light at night, so it does illuminate.
Now for the kicker…
Those idiots at Webster’s! Don’t they know that the there’s no such thing as “light of the Moon”? it’s really just sunlight being reflected off of the Moon! Sheesh!
Moonlight (noun)- the light of the moon. (Webster’s Dictionary)
One of the most prestigious peer-reviewed scientific journals in the World uses the term “moonlight”! What a bunch of idiots! Don’t they know anything about science at Nature!? There’s no such thing as “moonlight”, it is really sunlight being reflected by the Moon!
“With its concept for a new approach to outdoor lighting, the group asks: What if streetlights could respond to ambient moonlight, dimming and brightening each month as the moon cycles through its phases? On clear nights when the moon is full, streetlights might even turn off completely. The scheme, which they call “lunar-resonant streetlights,” could save as much as 80–90 percent of the energy used in streetlighting while bringing back the experience of moonlight and stargazing to urban areas.” - Posted by Steve Chase of Nature April 25, 2008
Those fools at the American Geophysical Union! They said that was an image of Hurricane Isaac by moonlight (light of the Moon)! Don’t they know that light bouncing off of the Moon is really just sunlight!
http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/201...moonlight/
I am in shock! Those morons at NASA use the term “moonlight” (light of the Moon) over 15 times in this article! Don’t those guys know that there is no such thing as moonlight? It’s really sunlight being reflected off of the Moon’s surface! I can’t believe my tax dollars fund such idiocy!
http://science1.nasa.gov/science-news/sc...moonlight/
So let’s see, the Bible, Dictionary, Nature, AGU, and NASA use similar language in describing the Moon. Obviously a source using such language does nothing to prove that the source is scientifically ignorant. You all will have to do better!
1. Genesis never says the Moon is a light source, so stop adding that language to the verse.
2. Genesis calls the Moon a light, which is completely valid, a light is simply anything that illuminates, and without the Moon there’d be virtually no natural light at night, so it does illuminate.
Now for the kicker…
Those idiots at Webster’s! Don’t they know that the there’s no such thing as “light of the Moon”? it’s really just sunlight being reflected off of the Moon! Sheesh!
Moonlight (noun)- the light of the moon. (Webster’s Dictionary)
One of the most prestigious peer-reviewed scientific journals in the World uses the term “moonlight”! What a bunch of idiots! Don’t they know anything about science at Nature!? There’s no such thing as “moonlight”, it is really sunlight being reflected by the Moon!
“With its concept for a new approach to outdoor lighting, the group asks: What if streetlights could respond to ambient moonlight, dimming and brightening each month as the moon cycles through its phases? On clear nights when the moon is full, streetlights might even turn off completely. The scheme, which they call “lunar-resonant streetlights,” could save as much as 80–90 percent of the energy used in streetlighting while bringing back the experience of moonlight and stargazing to urban areas.” - Posted by Steve Chase of Nature April 25, 2008
Those fools at the American Geophysical Union! They said that was an image of Hurricane Isaac by moonlight (light of the Moon)! Don’t they know that light bouncing off of the Moon is really just sunlight!
http://blogs.agu.org/wildwildscience/201...moonlight/
I am in shock! Those morons at NASA use the term “moonlight” (light of the Moon) over 15 times in this article! Don’t those guys know that there is no such thing as moonlight? It’s really sunlight being reflected off of the Moon’s surface! I can’t believe my tax dollars fund such idiocy!
http://science1.nasa.gov/science-news/sc...moonlight/
So let’s see, the Bible, Dictionary, Nature, AGU, and NASA use similar language in describing the Moon. Obviously a source using such language does nothing to prove that the source is scientifically ignorant. You all will have to do better!
