(July 13, 2013 at 5:56 pm)pineapplebunnybounce Wrote:(July 13, 2013 at 5:19 pm)Consilius Wrote: The cause of the universe made time, hence it was not limited by time. Edison didn't need a lightbulb. The cause of the universe is timeless.Mistakes:
The cause of the universe made cause, hence it is not a product of cause. The father of cause cannot also be the son of cause. Therfore, it is uncaused. Our cause of the universe does not need time to make time, as Edison didn't need to work by electrical light. The cause of the universe caused the universe without using time. The expansion of the universe (time) helped the universe to cause things in a more independent manner. You can build a robot without the help of a robot and let the machine do what you could do yourself, but on its own. Yet the robot can do nothing outside of what it was intended to do and its all of your idea.
1. confusing time with mass.
2. i've underlined the statements that have graduated from the school of assumption and moved on to the school of i-completely-made-this-up.
3. illogical reasonings (italicized)
And this is why you don't have a nobel prize.
Time and space were brought into being at the beginning of the universe along with matter and energy.
We live in a universe where everything has a cause. Why would a changing universe where cause and effect have a role in absolutely everything conceivable be itself uncaused? Why should our understanding of cause and effect stop with the vessel of all cause and effect?
Nothing can be created when it already exists.