One question for Christians

[Bad Writer]

Assuming that they're right in the first place is fallacious. Why is this mode of thinking looked down upon? Do we not assume innocence until proven guilty?

You sir have the patience of a saint. You have concisely raised
irreconcilable objections. I really enjoyed reading such carefully worded thoughts. Bravo!

Thank you, but I object to being compared to a saint

---

I was getting near the end of my post last night, and I found a goof from then. Let me reword this:

You can disbelieve all you want, but things that demonstrably exist, such as Buddhism, must be recognized as real (no belief or faith necessary). Atheism and agnosticism are real, and since they have no tenets, there is nothing to disbelieve, since they are merely statements of disbelief themselves.

I should say that ideas are demonstrably true. I'm not at all saying that Buddhism's tenets are true. I was making sure SW understood what disbelieving required, and since Atheism, Anti-Theism, and Agnosticism do not have tenets, they cannot even be disbelieved, as they are merely ideas that truly exist.