RE: One question for Christians
July 28, 2013 at 9:43 am
(This post was last modified: July 28, 2013 at 9:56 am by The Reality Salesman01.)
(July 26, 2013 at 7:45 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Really? I am interested now, what is my consequent? Without a logical syllogism I’d love to know how you claim to know what I am using as my antecedent and what I am using as my consequent.
Yes, you're right stat. I was using it as a figure of speech. I was pointing out that you tend to think that scripture is self-evident and use it to make arguments for God. Your circular logic begs the question. Your statement was suggestive that if you attempted to make a syllogistic argument, you would not be able to do so without committing a fallacy, and you did not disappoint...
(July 26, 2013 at 7:45 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: P1 If secularists assume scripture is wrong in order to argue scripture is wrong, then they are begging the question.Affirming the consequent. You are avoiding alternatives. Such as (The scriptures not being self-evident and lacking sufficient reason themselves) Just to name one.
P2 Secularists assume scripture is wrong in order to argue scripture is wrong
C1 Therefore, secularists are begging the question
.
Cute kid...real cute.
p1- If a round object is white, it is a wheel of cheese.
P2-the moon is a round object that is white
p3- The moon is a wheel of cheese
Statler's School of Logic supports this message.
