RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
August 13, 2013 at 12:03 pm
(This post was last modified: August 13, 2013 at 12:05 pm by ronedee.)
(August 13, 2013 at 11:49 am)The Germans are coming Wrote:(August 13, 2013 at 11:46 am)ronedee Wrote: Lucky you
As expected you refuse the links I posted and take refuge in soley answering the low part of my reply.
Dumbass!
I don't read [your] links.
Have I called you any names like: dickhead, douchebag, numbskull, idiot....? oh yes I did call you an idiot.... nevermind
(August 13, 2013 at 12:01 pm)CleanShavenJesus Wrote:(August 13, 2013 at 11:46 am)ronedee Wrote: Its all thoery my friend! Just like creationism. I've read enough to know that a "synthsis" or "meiosis" of genetic material doesn't necessarily constitute an egg. But whatever. I failed biology in school.
False. Creationism fits the definition of a hypothesis. It doesn't even get "theory" distinction.
Thanks for clearing that up for me!
And Egg-volution? Is that fact...professor? I have my pen & paper ready.
Quis ut Deus?
