Question for our resident creationist(s)

[gall]

Refute this if you really think you can, but clearly I spent far more time paying attention in high school than you did. Little less time reading up on mindless, brain-numbing psalms, less time making Hail-Marys, more time paying attention to shit that has been scientifically established as fundamental elements of the universe around us. If your goal is to not get laughed out of the room by anyone with any semblance of education on the topic, then I advise you to actually pay attention to things that aren't just spoon-fed to you by a bunch of 40+-year old virgins who want to make you as miserable as they are.

Look... I appreciate your time and energy spent writing all this down for me.

But, the fact remains that its all theory.

And I should've clarified earlier that I meant the miracle is that water is here on earth in abundance. Not that it exsists at all.

But, the frustration of trying to prove a point that is based on theory is the point I'm making here.

I really don't give a rats posterior about theory until its law! Its fun to watch but could blow-up in your face at any moment.

Until then, you are in my position of arguing observations by men, and your passion about [believing] it true.

I'll take the atheists platform here: "There isn't enough evidence to convince me." When you can prove your point(s) beyond a shadow of a doubt, I'll believe you, and the scientific community."

But, this is just stuff written in books based on: observation, hypothosis, and theory. It NOT LAW... Yet. And no amount of you screaming and swearing at me will change that fact. Or prove your theory personally!

Sound familiar?

In science you are correct. Theory and law are two different things in science.


take from the site:
http://thehappyscientist.com/study-unit/...become-law

Laws tell us what happens.
Theories examine what happens and tell us how and why it happens.


Simple I know but it was better than my own words and very accurate.

yeah...