One question for Christians

[Statler Waldorf]

[b]I wasn't aware you'd made a point/b’, beyond illustrating my prediction. Thanks for that.

I see, then I will keep it very simple for you this time. You were making an argument that assumed the animals on the ark would behave like animals typically do. Are you with me so far? I am arguing for the historicity of the Biblical ark account. Still with me? That means that you are going to have to argue against the Biblical account, and not a misrepresentation of the Biblical account? Still with me? The Biblical account clearly states that the animals did not behave normally, so you were arguing against a misrepresentation of the Biblical account by assuming they did. This means your argumentation was fallacious and therefore proves nothing. Did you follow all of that?

Can't help you with the smell though. Some people just project that kind of odour.

Evidently.