RE: One question for Christians
August 27, 2013 at 7:05 pm
(This post was last modified: August 27, 2013 at 7:06 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(August 27, 2013 at 6:46 pm)Stimbo Wrote: I'm typing this very slowly for you, so you can keep up.
I have no problem keeping up with you; you’re the one who admitted having difficulties.
Quote: I wasn't making any argument, merely an observation that literal creationists seem to be stuck in a mindset that forces them to pull the "Goddidit" ripcord and abandon their own argument as soon as they paint themselves into a corner.
No, we just adhere to the Biblical account, so we’re not going to postulate a natural explanation for something the Biblical account already gave us an explanation for. Pretty simple really.
Quote: That's one reason creationists tend not to be taken seriously.
No, it’s a natural tendency for people to ridicule positions they otherwise have no logical defense against.
Quote: I mean, it's cute when a six-year-old tells a story and has a magic butterfly swoop down from nowhere to save the plot from crashing; but a grown adult? For shame!
That’s an irrelevant analogy. We live in a Universe governed by the Creator, you cannot avoid His involvement.
Quote: But please, do prove me wrong. Detail one single account of how the ark could possibly operate as a scientific reality, without once having to throw god magic into the recipe.
Why do you insist on misrepresenting my position? The Biblical account (which is what I am arguing for) clearly states that God was miraculously involved in several aspects of the ark account. I hate to break it to you, but Donkeys don’t naturally talk either lol.
(August 27, 2013 at 6:56 pm)BadWriterSparty Wrote: I predict a slice of twisted words, a cup of special pleading, and a side of godidit.
In your next post? Most likely, if you bother actually responding that is.
