(September 5, 2013 at 10:07 am)BadWriterSparty Wrote: I still fail to see the problem. No one is misunderstanding evangelism or what it is to be a theologian. You've set up a distraction from the main point of this thread.
This is not a distraction. My work here completely resolves the issue being brought up bythe OP.
The OP main point is that Paul did not write anything to confirm the gospels.
I point out that only an evanglist preaches the Gospel.
I also established that All of Paul's evanglism took place one on one with the people he Spoke with in the areas he established his Churches. (The churches he later writes to that become books of the bible)
Then I conclude that there would be no reason to write down an evangelical message, as the letters he did write were to his diciples he left incharge of a given region's congergation. (They themselves as a leader of a church had to be evangelists in their own right, and would not need Paul to reteach them the gospel.) That is why all of His writting to these various churches were from a theological stand point rather than an evangelical stand point. (Why his letters address day to day life as an established Christian rather than preaching a message of conversion To Christianity.) This is what he identifies as Milk (the gospel) and Meat (The day to day living as a Christian.)
