The question isn't-Can we understand why a primitive, human civilization might have thought this is acceptable?
It's-Why does the rationale of a supposed perfect being mirror that of a primitive human civilization?
Answer: no perfect being, the latter is all that existed. I guess this sounds crazy to you, eh Drich?
It's-Why does the rationale of a supposed perfect being mirror that of a primitive human civilization?
Answer: no perfect being, the latter is all that existed. I guess this sounds crazy to you, eh Drich?