RE: Exposed: The Obama Invasion of Syria
September 13, 2013 at 7:48 pm
(This post was last modified: September 13, 2013 at 7:53 pm by Something completely different.)
(September 13, 2013 at 7:36 pm)Chuck Wrote: I don't care about his line of thinking. His points are valid.
it is not.
He is painting an untrue picture by ignoring the good that has been done by the US, and yes there is good. He is appealing to emotions by reinvoking memories of the catastrophies which are Afghanistan and Iraq and is outright liying when concerning Lybia. War wearyness is not an excuse for not intervention when it is required. And so far every other argument brought forward here is one that claims that "maybe" the chemical weapons "could have been" used by the rebels. Which is something unexpected and utterly idiotic. There is a good reason why whites claimed that civil rights leaders were planting bombs in black churches to make the "KKK look bad". Aswell as there is a reason why Hitler blamed international judaism for the beginning of WW2, Iran blaming 9/11 on the goverment ecetera. It is a pathetic flight from what the indications really point at and to paint somethign that would otherwise not stand by itself as legit.
And it is utterly disgusting that the man whos party has murdered and beaten half dead journalists uses the free press of the west to publish this message. May Anna Politkovskaya rise from the dead and eat his face.