(October 1, 2013 at 10:50 am)Faith No More Wrote:(October 1, 2013 at 10:36 am)SavedByGraceThruFaith Wrote: When an atheist invokes the possibility of God, the atheist has just contradicted their own belief.
I can only assume from your response that you did not read what I wrote, you completely ignored, or you didn't get my point.
Do you understand that pointing out an argument works equally for different god is not invoking the possibility of a god? Do you understand that being an atheist doesn't mean denying that god is a possibility?
You still are using a possible God to try to defeat Pascal's wager.
But the argument of multiple "believe or damned" claims does not help the atheists or the agnostic at all. The risk of infinite loss is the same and there is still no reward. So Pascal's wager still holds.
Pascal's wager would say look at all the claims and pick the right one. In reality, only one will not be self contradictory. Then that is the correct one.
