Why atheism always has a burden of proof

[pocaracas]

So... yay, I guess god is a scientifically provable hypothesis in the end. So, where's them peer reviewed studies that reveal this?

No because God can't be physically observed therefore you can't physically detect or test his existence via the scientific method. It seems to be difficult to get this point across but that's how it is. You can't have a burden of proof for something that can't by it's nature ever be proven.

How convenient, huh?
The same guy who, allegedly, talked to Abraham, wrote stone tablets, brought a great flood upon the whole world, made a woman pregnant, gave sight back to some people, cured lepers, revived people.... yet... "can't be physically detected"?

I smell a rat...