RE: Why the Bible is true
October 11, 2013 at 2:30 pm
(This post was last modified: October 11, 2013 at 2:34 pm by Godscreated.)
(October 11, 2013 at 2:24 am)max-greece Wrote:(October 11, 2013 at 2:07 am)Captain Colostomy Wrote: This Rabbi says no...either translation doesn't work, not when there is a specific word for 'virgin', which Izzy doesn't use for this instance-
http://www.outreachjudaism.org/articles/...irgin.html
You get the same problem in the NT in Greek - the word for virgin is not used (Parthena) - the word for young woman is.
The word means young unmarried woman that is able to bear children, if she was not a virgin then the word harlot would be used, of coarse sensible thinking doesn't agree with those who try and disprove scriptures, just trying to win is more important than the truth. How much more dishonest can people get. So I say again the word virgin or young woman are acceptable. You got proof she was not a virgin, then bring it, don't sit around acting like your claim is true without proof.
![Smile Smile](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/smile.gif)
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.