(November 1, 2013 at 8:16 pm)Maelstrom Wrote:(November 1, 2013 at 8:13 pm)GodsRevolt Wrote: If there are some things that cannot be known for certain within the naturalistic method.
Then the automatic answer is not goddidit. That would be the intellectually lazy route.
I can agree with this. "Goddidit" as you say, means the seeker has stopped seeking. It is almost as mundane as "I know it all! Let's take nap!" although I do not disagree with naps.
In my defense, I did not that the argument MAY go on being called supernatural - Not MUST go on as such. Free will remains in any situation.
". . . let the atheists themselves choose a god. They will find only one divinity who ever uttered their isolation; only one religion in which God seemed for an instant to be an atheist." -G. K. Chesterton