(November 5, 2013 at 2:01 pm)Godschild Wrote:(November 5, 2013 at 3:01 am)orogenicman Wrote: I understood what you said. I also understood what you said elsewhere. It's not like either of us are new to the forum. You have made statements about your beliefs, and it is clear that you expect us to take you at your word. Sorry, Charlie, that isn't how it works.
Stating what I know to be truth does not mean I believe you will take it as truth, I do hope someone would investigate if what I say peaks their interest, like you said, we've been here for a while and I know how others see things.
GC
We do, in fact, investigate what you say, and that's why we so frequently call you on your bullshite. The fact remains that if you can't be bothered to support your claims, no one is under any obligation to believe that they have any credibility. And you apparently are good with that. So again, if that is the case, why are you here? What's the point?
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
