RE: The most important reason anyone is a atheist
November 14, 2013 at 9:58 am
(This post was last modified: November 14, 2013 at 10:09 am by Little Rik.)
(November 14, 2013 at 9:33 am)Rationalman Wrote:(November 14, 2013 at 8:15 am)enrico Wrote: If no one knows then how come that all the atheist guys in this forum were backing the one who said that life is finite?
Because that is where all the evidence points to.
Show me this evidence boy but try to be quick, Christmas is getting closer by the day.
(November 14, 2013 at 8:15 am)enrico Wrote: Actually i am the one who miss something.
I mean i must have missed that part where you explain with evidence that life is finite.
Help me please.
In what page is that?
Quote:What is this...the third or fourth time I have had to explain this to you? The scientific consensus is that death is finite. I do not have to produce any evidence to you. Your idea goes against scientific consensus therefore you have to present evidence that life is infinite.
But nice try at a distraction. Now please show me where you demolished a pillar of atheism. Or are you just lying again?
Scientific consensus...
You mean that the guys that are engaged in physical science managed to find what lie outside the corral in which they are stuck to?
Since when something non physical like consciousness can be study by physical science?
Can you see how foolish you are?
You have become an embarrassment to most of the other atheist guys.
(November 14, 2013 at 9:44 am)Tonus Wrote: I wouldn't use "scientific consensus" as the yardstick, because scientists have been wrong before and they will be wrong again. It's the nature of the beast.
The yardstick is that the best evidence that we do have for a continuation of consciousness after death is weak anecdotes and competing mythologies that offer no proof. Enrico is no different from any other person here who claims that our soul or consciousness live on without our physical body. If he ever provides some proof he would be. 'You guys don't get it' is neither evidence, nor proof, nor even an argument.
Strange indeed.
You guys rely on physical science so if you follow this policy you would trust Abe Alexander after all he is a neurosurgeon.
But no.
So what policy are you following?
The cherry picking policy?