RE: The catch-all gun thread
November 30, 2013 at 11:57 am
(This post was last modified: November 30, 2013 at 12:01 pm by Captain Colostomy.)
(November 30, 2013 at 11:46 am)Optimistic Mysanthrope Wrote:(November 30, 2013 at 11:29 am)Rahul Wrote: It's better to have a gun and not need it than to need a gun and not have it.
But for all of you that want to voluntarily disarm yourselves, go for it. After all, when seconds count the police are only minutes away.
Presumably, you also make sure you always have a bulletproof vest, an NBC suit, a syringe of atropine, a first aid kit, full complement of tools, etc....
I mean, it's better to have them and not need them, right?
What? No subterranean bunker with 20+ years of MRE's and proximity sensors and claymore mines? Some good that box o' band-aids will be...
(November 30, 2013 at 11:40 am)Rahul Wrote:(November 30, 2013 at 11:35 am)Captain Colostomy Wrote: The police are part of the problem.
How do you mean?
Look...we all have opinions, it's just as a non-Texan, mine's valid.
Situation dependent, calling the cops is like calling a fire mission, danger close. They are often all too willing to hurl bullets. Fucking cowboys.
