(November 30, 2013 at 11:32 pm)TheBeardedDude Wrote:Sir, I am saying that I would happily agree with the aforementioned requirements should they be introduced.(November 30, 2013 at 11:24 pm)freedomfromfallacy Wrote: Training, yes, and annual re-certification in proficiency and safety/lock-out maintenance.
License, yes, to aid in regulation and tracking of firearms across state lines.
Insurance, no, because it would over-inflate the market and raise the price of firearms.
"Training, yes, and annual re-certification in proficiency and safety/lock-out maintenance."
Where? Because I can safely say there was no such requirement in Tennessee when I lived there.
"License, yes, to aid in regulation and tracking of firearms across state lines."
For all guns you have to have a license? I know that one isn't true.
"Insurance, no, because it would over-inflate the market and raise the price of firearms."
Cost isn't an issue I am concerned with.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: October 29, 2025, 10:10 pm
Thread Rating:
|
The catch-all gun thread
|
|
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


