(November 30, 2013 at 11:48 pm)freedomfromfallacy Wrote:(November 30, 2013 at 11:32 pm)TheBeardedDude Wrote: "Training, yes, and annual re-certification in proficiency and safety/lock-out maintenance."Sir, I am saying that I would happily agree with the aforementioned requirements should they be introduced.
Where? Because I can safely say there was no such requirement in Tennessee when I lived there.
"License, yes, to aid in regulation and tracking of firearms across state lines."
For all guns you have to have a license? I know that one isn't true.
"Insurance, no, because it would over-inflate the market and raise the price of firearms."
Cost isn't an issue I am concerned with.
My bad, I thought you were saying that these were things already implemented in the US.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/FJovzGlbuoEXm/giphy.gif)