RE: The etiquette of rep
December 3, 2013 at 8:55 am
(This post was last modified: December 3, 2013 at 8:57 am by Napoléon.)
(December 3, 2013 at 1:43 am)Chas Wrote: An atheist forum does not benefit from having delusional moderators.
I get the sentiment about 'delusions', but I actually think this site has benefited and will continue to benefit from having non-atheist staff members, so long as their beliefs play no role in their moderating. Personally I'm sick of this image that seems to be out there that atheists are branded with. That we all want the world to burn and that we all bash on non-atheists constantly almost to the point of irrationality (don't get me wrong, we do for the most part and with good reason, but not all of us are intent on being anti-theists (also for good reason)). I think having non-atheist staff members goes a fairly long way to dispelling that bullshit, at least in our little corner of the web.
Quote:And Apo is a bully. Not a good character trait for a moderator.
I think we've had some, shall we say, questionable characters in the past doing the moderating and I still think they did a good job. I don't think I've ever seen any evidence of Apo being a bully, all I will say is half the time I don't understand what she means in her posts.