Maybe People Should Not Look Up To YouTube Atheist

[Darth]

in one thread I created on misogyny, certain individuals cited him as if he were some sort of person that I maybe should pay heed to.

This is the fifth thread that you have made according to your profile.
Looking at the other 4 threads you have made:
Women's rights and religion: http://atheistforums.org/thread-22204.html
Evolution, intelligence, suggestibility and religion: http://atheistforums.org/thread-22042.html
The men's rights movement: I just don't get it: http://atheistforums.org/thread-21853.html
Introduction: because everyone is doing it and I feel peer presured: http://atheistforums.org/thread-21852-page-3.html

The only video I could find linked was on page 5 of women's right's and religion, a theramin trees/qualiasoup video linked by Fidel Castronaut.
A command-F search on each page for the word "amazing" also revealed no links or mentions of the amazing atheist.

Now, either it was threads you didn't make and you're mistaken, or you're talking out your ass.

I'll save you the bother of godwining this thread as you did in the very first post in that men's rights movement thread and just call everybody a nazi now, so we can move on.

Second: Arguing against aspects of feminism or feminists (unless it's the first wave suffrage issue or something) hardly makes one a misogynist. Is he saying women are evil, or that feminists are? I want to see the evidence of the thoughtcrime before I get my torch & pitchfork out, unpersoning somebody based on your say-so bellyfeels doubleplusungood to me.

Third: This alleged linking to the amazing atheist, which wasn't in your thread as we've already established, provide the link please. You've already called people out, you may as well link to it so that others can judge the merits of your argument. I want to see if the next part of this sentence is any more truthful or accurate that the last:

... certain individuals cited him as if he were some sort of person that I maybe should pay heed to

Fourth: Argumentum ad hominem. The arguments presented in the videos people link stand or fall on their own merits. Other things the person has said are largely irrelevant, and without the link to the post I can't know if the person has linked the video by itself or said "boy, this guy is amazing and I agree 100% with everything he has every posted on youtube, heres an example of his amazingness"