(December 14, 2013 at 12:24 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: It is disingenuous to say that one type of opinion is allowed because it is partisan (but secular) one but another is not allowed because it is religious.
No it's not. It's fairly plain. One opinion is allowed because it doesn't further a single religion. The other is not because it does. Partisan has nothing to do with it.
What's disingenuous is the amount of equivocation and substitution of terms you'll go through to justify wanting to push your single religion using my (and everyone else's) land and resources.
Government + religion, no. Government + secular viewpoints, okay. For reasons it doesn't take a prophet to foresee.
It's like they say, to a Christian, not being allowed to force everybody else = oppression of their religion.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)