(December 18, 2013 at 11:54 am)xpastor Wrote:(December 18, 2013 at 10:37 am)Drich Wrote: I would have thought someone claiming to be a 'pastor' at somepoint in his life would have a little more knoweledge and understanding than a common atheist has about the basic fundimentals of Christianity. How does one goto seminary and not know that the Virgin birth of Christ in of it self is not proof of anything? It's almost like you didn't actually go. If you had you would have known the virgin birth of Christ was a sign of Christ's deity along with thousands of other 'signs and wonders' He was apart of. This particular sign full filled one single prophesy. Everything else Christ live out and did full filled the others. It is the combination of all of his works/life, that underscores who Christ was.Drich, this is perhaps the last occasion when I will waste my time replying to you. In seven short sentences all your major failings are on display.
1. You habitually contradict yourself because you are so eager to shoot off your mouth that you don't stop and think. First, you say that the virgin birth of Christ is not proof of anything.
Do you know what the phrase I highlighted means? If not ask someone or look it up, then I'll give you a chance to rewrite your post to reflect your new understanding of what i said.
