(December 18, 2013 at 4:35 pm)Drich Wrote: How does one goto seminary and not know that the Virgin birth of Christ in of it self is not proof of anything?Actually the phrase you put in big bold letters means bugger-all although I can guess at it. The correct phrase in English would be in itself or in Latin per se.
Do you know what the phrase I highlighted means? If not ask someone or look it up, then I'll give you a chance to rewrite your post to reflect your new understanding of what i said.
Your argument still amounts to nothing. First you say in effect that the virgin birth tells us nothing of Christ's status, and then you claim that it shows Christ's deity. You can't have it both ways. Either you think the story of the virgin birth is meaningful or you think it is not meaningful
If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people — House
