(February 21, 2010 at 9:01 pm)Shell B Wrote: Actually, it does apply to the conversation. Last I checked, not all of the questions presented mentioned the bible. It is you who seem to want to stick strictly to the bible in this conversation. Again, you are not arguing that pre-marital sex is taboo in many religions, so why do you continue to bring it up as if it were some ace-in-the-hole for you?I'm not even sure what you're on about anymore, let's just drop that one.
Quote:And the other demanding rules of "Sex may never be used as a weapon against a spouse, either by depriving the spouse of sex or by compelling it. It is a serious offense to use sex (or lack thereof) to punish or manipulate a spouse." It's really not as hard as you're making it out to be.Quote:Well yeah, but it's not like the rules are that demanding. I can live with no incest or bestiality.
I love how you say that as if those were the only rules.
Quote:For whom? Rest assured, I am hardly troubled by calling "him" the sky-wizard.
It seems very unnecessary. It makes no point and does nothing besides taking a childish shot at religion.