RE: Gay marriage
January 5, 2014 at 9:39 pm
(This post was last modified: January 5, 2014 at 9:40 pm by Chas.)
(January 5, 2014 at 8:51 am)Aractus Wrote:Quote: really doubt that will happen. Churches have always been able to refuse to marry any couple they don't want to for any reason.Well, in Australia medical staff who are ethically/morally opposed to abortions have to perform them - including 2nd/3rd trimester abortions. It is against the law for doctors/nurses to say they don't want to do it.
On the issue of Marriage - if we allow same sex marriage then why not allow all forms of marriage we don't currently allow? Child-child, child-adult, incestuous couples? Now before you claim that my argument is rubbish - I believe every relationship I've mentioned should be legally recognized under civil union legislation, along with same-sex/heterosexual/polygamy, and every one else. Even if you redefine marriage to allow same-sex couples, you're still discriminating against other groups of people, just not same-sex couples anymore.
So you say that same-sex marriage ends discrimination, but it doesn't. Discrimination isn't always a bad thing, and the ideology behind same-sex marriage is no different.
Your argument is, in fact, idiotic. Children cannot consent or make contracts.
Union between two consenting adults is the issue here, and extending that to all adults.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.