(February 27, 2010 at 9:06 pm)Alex Wrote: You still worded it very poorly the first time, but okay.
Really? I'm sorry, but you can not make it any more blunt than stating the "Tao" movement is looked at as a threat to Buddhism/Confucianism across Asia... That's now the 3rd time Alex...TAO IS VIEWED AS A TYPE OF THREAT TO THE B & C ACROSS ASIA... I can't make it anymore elementary for you...
Quote:I'm not rabbi
Was being centical, no more, no less...If you took it as an offense, I apologize...
Quote:Calm down mate. You essentially called Jainism and Hinduism the same thing - they're not, though they are related as I said. Going on an anti-theistic tirade hardly proves anything.
I'm calm mate, but you stating they are no where near the same is like stating a "Protestant & a Catholic" have no relations what so ever...
Quote:Edit: Whoops, I mean Shinto came before Confucianism.
Ummm....No.....There is NO proof of this, and has been a debate for a very long time now....Confucianism has been considered older, but then you have the Hindu religion trumping them both....
Quote:You really have no idea what Neo-pagan means.
PROTIP: Hinduism and Buddhism are in no way Neo-pagan.
Just by you stating that "Hindusim and Buddhism are "NOT" Neo-Pagan beliefs, you have lost all creditability of anything you comment on, on these forums.....
Buddhism, Hinduism, Wiccan, etc. are amongst the "MANY" that are defined as "Neo-Pagan"....For fuck sake, Buddhism and Hinduism are like the poster child for the term...."New" "Pagan"..... Just look it up, call someone, ...lol...
P.S. Half my fucking family is Wiccan and Buddhist....The other half is Muslim (From Lebanon)......My eyes are already bleeding from your bullshit....
Intelligence is the only true moral guide...