(January 19, 2014 at 11:36 pm)Drich Wrote: what are you talking about seriously? I was speaking to the reason why the city consul man would not stone a gay woman as a Christian. I have absolutely no idea how you got your above comment from what I wrote.
Well, if you can't stone 'em... what else is there? What directions can you take from the bible for how to deal with gays? None, because there aren't any. And as you mentioned John 8, I figured you'd be in favor of not casting any stones at all, of any stripe, given that you aren't without sin yourself.
Quote:when did you start on this point? Your initial rebuttal had nothing to do with this. Or is this what you last post was about? Is that why you last post created a strawman and made a left turn that had nothing to do with anything I have said?
Go back and read the OP. It's been my entire point, all along.
Other than that, I think we're rather arguing at cross purposes here: you're arguing that sex is a sin, I agree that that's in your religion. My point is that your own religion recommends no sanctions against this kind of sex, so there's no reason to bring up the bible as an argument against marriage equality.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
