God: No magic required

[Angrboda]

You can choose plausibility, in which case belief is unjustified, or you can choose pragmatism, the "I believe because it benefits me to do so." You can't waffle back and forth to suit the temporary need of your argument. That's the sin of equivocation, and it means the things you've written aren't worth shit.

On top of everything, I'm relatively confident that those studies refer to people who believe because they truly believe, not just because studies demonstrate that believers live longer. Since you belong to the latter category, or are advocating people join that category, none of the studies you've referenced even apply because they refer to a different category of religious believer. So, no, your words and argument are crap, and your studies don't apply in the way you need them to apply, so they're crap too.

Do you have anything that isn't crap? Oh wait. I forgot. You made a point of explaining how you seek out groups that are diametrically opposed to you for the experience of heated discussion. Since most folk here are, obviously, atheist, that paints you as self-consciously theist, despite your horse shit about "passing as an atheist." I wonder how this God whom you believe in for the health benefit feels about you being a lying sack of shit. And are there any health benefits to being a lying sack of shit? Well, I guess you'd know the answer to that (yes, I've perused some of your professional representations). It probably doesn't benefit your patients for you to peddle quack cancer treatments to them, but I'm sure it helps you jet set in style.

Have I overlooked any of your other lies and boneheaded bullshit? I'm sure I'll get back to it if I have.