(February 4, 2014 at 9:29 am)Esquilax Wrote:I was hoping he would reply!(February 4, 2014 at 9:23 am)pocaracas Wrote: Now, tell me why you brought up a flawed measurement, when it was stupidly applied to a piece of rock known to be grossly outside of the method's domain of applicability.
Because he's looking exclusively for information that confirms his pre-existing beliefs, while intentionally ignoring anything that challenges or contradicts it?
I thought the last few pages made that pretty clear.![]()
Good job on looking that up, mind: I didn't even think to do that.
