(February 7, 2014 at 10:52 am)Chad32 Wrote: I think the idea was that a flood wouldn't kill things that could breathe under water. Ignoring that fresh water fish can't live in salt water, and the raging rapids would kill a lot of fish anyway.
It's almost like the people who wrote the story didn't understand much about how things work in relation to altitude and different kinds of waters and ecosystems.
Not understanding the effects that a global flood would have on the entire earth? No....
It's a good thing god erased all the evidence of this global flood. Except he left the Grand Canyon there to remind us.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
