(March 12, 2014 at 12:40 pm)LostLocke Wrote:(March 12, 2014 at 12:35 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: It was called feminism because it concerned itself with women only, i.e. claimed to work in the interest of women. And the overwhelming majority of its "adherents" are women. That can't be a coincidence.Just like in the 1800's in the US when the slaves were trying to win freedom, all the participates were black, there were no whites helping....
The ones you're referring to already have their own little clique.
Oh wait, there were.
Some whites didn't help because they liked things the way they were. IE blacks knew their 'place' in white society.
Some probably did want to help but were afraid of what would happen to them socially and personally.
So when feminism started of course most of it would be females.
Men didn't help either because they liked how things were or were afraid to. But yet, there were men in the beginning who did make sacrifices to help out.
To be honest, the slaves in the US didn't fight for their freedom, they simply were granted freedom. Something that isn't uncommon really, it is only another display of power of a master to free a slave.
And I know, the suffrage movement and all, though it was a regional movement back then, not an internationalist movement as it is now.
As international as it may be, it still does not appeal to men, in my opinion, of course.
![[Image: trkdevletbayraklar.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i128.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp161%2Fazmhyr%2Ftrkdevletbayraklar.jpg)
Üze Tengri basmasar, asra Yir telinmeser, Türük bodun ilingin törüngin kim artatı udaçı erti?