(March 18, 2014 at 5:14 am)Alex K Wrote:(March 18, 2014 at 3:18 am)Shaykh al-Kabir Shair Abdulrab Wrote: The premise is essentially the reverse of the religious ontological argument. God is the label applied to the most inconceivable entity possible. The existence of god is thus semantical and irrelevant at this conclusion because it only provides a label to an idea that cannot be described nor fathomed
I don't understand. I guess that proves it?
To be honest I did not realize halfway through that I was arguing over the nature of god. Sorry but the ontological argument is used in both cases by me as I do not take it to a religious level and apply a holy writ to it. Sort of stupid now that I think of it.
![[Image: tumblr_n8f4c0zuQE1twxzjco1_1280.png]](https://38.media.tumblr.com/2b3973690a56d1cd20fd3da8cdb87d2c/tumblr_n8f4c0zuQE1twxzjco1_1280.png)