(March 29, 2014 at 5:21 pm)Lek Wrote: The situation you propose wouldn't be a good test because you would have no way of knowing if your subjects were really opening themselves up or just pretending; or thinking they are.
Ah, but you could dictate the method for the experiment itself; you evidently know the actions one must take to find the correct god, so you could lead others to that, I would think.
The problem I see is that you're intent on making your claim unfalsifiable: every time someone doesn't find precisely the thing you want them to find, you've got this ready made excuse of "they weren't sincere."
Well, that's great, but now your claim about god is officially drifting way beyond the scope of reason. It is actually possible to retract your claim so far that it becomes untenable, you know.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
