Again, you are missing the point. Let me lay this out for you in, ah, a deductive form:
Which of these do you deny? You already agreed with 1). 2) and 3) are true by definition of the terms involved. Clearly you accept 4). Hence, 5) follows deductively for you but not for someone like, say, Chad who rejects 1)
Quote:1) If God exists, his omniscience includes knowledge of future events.
2) God's knowledge of future events entails the truth of determinism, otherwise God could not have actual knowledge of what the future held.
3) If determinism is true, then libertarian free will is false.
4) God exists.
5) Therefore, libertarian free will is false. (from 1 - 4).
Which of these do you deny? You already agreed with 1). 2) and 3) are true by definition of the terms involved. Clearly you accept 4). Hence, 5) follows deductively for you but not for someone like, say, Chad who rejects 1)
