Argument #1: Transitional Fossils

[pocaracas]

You're, of course, aware that science isn't made from the drawings and artistic depictions which are based on very incomplete fossils, aren't you?
The science that comes through to the masses is very simplified and the drawings help the public relate... the actual scientists couldn't care less about those drawings.... so I fail to understand why you keep bringing them forward...

Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me. Can't we learn from the artful rendering of Nebraska Man? So now I have to buy into every rendering made from fossils that are supposed to be the missing link or a proof of a transitional organism? No, sir, no.


http://rdlindsey.com/flashfacts/Nebraska.html

Man... I didn't even have to read past the first paragraph!

The top scientists of the world examined this tooth and appraised it as proof positive of a prehistoric race in America.

Did they examine the drawings?

Oh, also

Tennessee, in 1925.

What sort of place is Tennessee? (it rhymes with what holds up your pants and also with the sole book you read)