RE: Judge rules it was OK for widow to lose home over $6.30 in unpaid interest
April 29, 2014 at 10:31 am
(This post was last modified: April 29, 2014 at 10:32 am by Autumnlicious.)
by the way, the reason why outright assholes and sympathetic housewives are treated different under nearly identical circumstances in law usually is because a judge has decided to treat things differently based on context.
You wouldn't want a legal system that ignores context, would you?
You keep arguing for a conclusion, however others have raised questions that support said conclusion. Who is using faith here – the people who are worried about a procedure taking advantage of another and would have been satisfied had it taken a little bit longer to reach a conclusion, or someone who simply argues that because it doesn't appear invalid, that it must be perfectly legitimate?
Judges are not infallible – because many are elected, it raises the question of how fallible they really are.
You wouldn't want a legal system that ignores context, would you?
You keep arguing for a conclusion, however others have raised questions that support said conclusion. Who is using faith here – the people who are worried about a procedure taking advantage of another and would have been satisfied had it taken a little bit longer to reach a conclusion, or someone who simply argues that because it doesn't appear invalid, that it must be perfectly legitimate?
Judges are not infallible – because many are elected, it raises the question of how fallible they really are.
Slave to the Patriarchy no more
