Evolution, religion, and ignorance.

[Rampant.A.I.]

And as I said, if those biologists wish to propose a falsifiable hypothesis as to what those macro-mechanisms are, as well as how they're meaningfully different from micro ones, test that hypothesis, and show real evidence that they exist and how they work, then I will listen.

Whatever - I didn't think this was about your beliefs. I don't really care if you believe differently from the biologists the TO article had in mind.

Until then, the distinction is a meaningless one made to prop up intractable creationists.

The term was coined by an evolutionist.

Given that the "micro" definition is demonstrable, and sufficient to cause the "macro" changes, then I suppose you accept evolution in general.

It's not a given that the micro definition is sufficient to cause macro changes.